Prediction of Ken Rosewall vs Alvin Gardiner Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
K. Rosewall vs A. Gardiner

Ken Rosewall

AUS

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Alvin Gardiner

AUS

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Rosewall 1 - 0 Gardiner

They have played 2 sets in total, with Ken Rosewall winning 2 and Alvin Gardiner winning 0. The last match between Ken Rosewall and Alvin Gardiner was at the Brisbane, 09-10-1979, Round: R3, Surface: Grass, with Ken Rosewall getting the victory 6-2 7-5.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Rosewall	1
Gardiner	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R3) Brisbane(10-09-79)

Stats

Ken Rosewall

Alvin Gardiner

K. Rosewall vs A. Gardiner H2H Profile

K. Rosewall	Stats	A. Gardiner
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
73.58% (543-195)	Career Total W/L	32.52% (53-110)
1	Grass	0
40	Titles	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

K. Rosewall vs A. Gardiner Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ken Rosewall has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Alvin Gardiner has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ken Rosewall, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Alvin Gardiner has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Ken Rosewall has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Alvin Gardiner has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Ken Rosewall has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Alvin Gardiner winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Ken Rosewall has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 78% (W/L 135/38), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 73% (W/L 158/57). Alvin Gardiner has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 78% (W/L 1/1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 31% (W/L 15/34).
Player level: In the last year, Ken Rosewall has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Alvin Gardiner has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ken Rosewall winning 1 times and Alvin Gardiner being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Ken Rosewall winning 2 and Alvin Gardiner winning 0.
The last match between Ken Rosewall and Alvin Gardiner was at the Brisbane, 09-10-1979, Round: R3, Surface: Grass, with Ken Rosewall getting the victory 6-2 7-5.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ken Rosewall has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Alvin Gardiner has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ken Rosewall has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Alvin Gardiner has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Ken Rosewall has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Alvin Gardiner has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Ken Rosewall vs Alvin Gardiner Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

K. Rosewall vs A. Gardiner H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

K. Rosewall	Stats	A. Gardiner
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
13	Games Won	7
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

K. Rosewall Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Melbourne Indoor - 20-10-1980
R4 Paul McnameeP. Mcnamee	L	6-0 6-3	Stats
R3 Butch WaltsB. Walts	W	6-3 6-2	Stats
Sydney Indoor - 13-10-1980
R4 John SadriJ. Sadri	L	7-5 3-6 6-3	Stats
R3 Tim WilkisonT. Wilkison	W	6-4 7-5	Stats
Brisbane - 06-10-1980
R4 Mark EdmondsonM. Edmondson	L	3-6 6-2 6-2	Stats

View All

A. Gardiner Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Brisbane CH - 06-12-1981
R2 Russell BarlowR. Barlow	W	3-6 7-5 7-5	Stats
R3 David MustardD. Mustard	L	6-3 6-3	Stats
Manila - 23-11-1981
R3 Larry StefankiL. Stefanki	L	6-4 7-5	Stats
Nagoya CH - 27-04-1981
R3 Charlie FancuttC. Fancutt	L	6-2 6-3	Stats
Tokyo CH - 20-04-1981
R3 Andy KohlbergA. Kohlberg	L	6-4 6-4	Stats

View All

K. Rosewall vs A. Gardiner Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

K. Rosewall	Stats	A. Gardiner
73.58% (543/195)	YTD Win/Loss	32.52% (53/110)
69.04% (1320/592)	Sets Win/Loss	33.25% (133/267)
57.16% (10396/7791)	Games Win/Loss	44.61% (1720/2136)
73.49% (158/57)	Hard Win/Loss	33.33% (15/30)
77.70% (115/33)	Clay Win/Loss	30.61% (15/34)
65.71% (115/60)	Indoor Hard W/L	42.86% (3/4)
78.03% (135/38)	Grass Win/Loss	31.67% (19/41)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
491.97	Average Opponent Rank	496.71
82.88% (92/19)	Slam W/L	17.39% (4/19)
78.95% (15/4)	Masters W/L	16.67% (1/5)
100.00% (2/0)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
71.62% (434/172)	Main Tour W/L	33.33% (38/76)
0% (0/0)	Challenger W/L	50.00% (10/10)
72% (381/527)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	33% (41/123)
77% (150/194)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	20% (7/35)
50% (8/16)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	0% (0/0)
59% (107/181)	Deciding Set Win %	46% (16/35)
91% (508/462)	1st Set Won, Won Match	76% (50/38)
9% (508/46)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	24% (50/12)
35% (226/79)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	11% (110/12)